End

As much as I'd like to discredit that my years at school shaped me, I can't deny that they, of course, did. There's a bias towards nostalgia that makes me hesitant to pop out old yearbooks and rave about how funny this was or how much fun something else was, but the longing for introspection is still there. 

When I Was younger, I used to separate school and private life completely in my head. I never really thought about school outside of school. I did my homework at lunch, during class, or more likely, the class right before. As I've grown older, though, I've begun to merge the two. Now, it's difficult to separate the huge changes in my life from school, the constant in my life. The habits from when I was younger still linger on. (I still have a strict no mentioning of the word "homework" policy outside of school around my friends.) 

It Was a very formative time. High school saw the most stressful and transformative time of my life so far. During high school, I came out, lived in France and Spain, studied Latin, French, Spanish and 5 others, developed my own voice, had a couple breakdowns, and made many of my best friends to say the least. It would be almost impossible for a person not to be somewhat sentimental about a time when so much occurred in their life. Though I am extremely excited for beginning my adult life, I still feel a desire to look back and think about and thank(linguistic nerd fact: "think" and "thank" come from the same root. "Thank you" implying that the person will think about the kind thing that the other person did for them) the people who were around me. 

I hope this post flowed as well as it did in my head. 

Thanks to everyone who helped me to become who I am today. Special thanks to my friends who kept me in the lines when I was swerving. Thank you, too, Ms. Genesky for being an amazing teacher who helped me through my rough times. I wish there were more people who are as nice of person as you.

Witty Whitman

Step 1:

On the inside cover of the journal, there appears to be a stamp on the page. Beside the stamp are names with addresses from the top of the page down. I now see on a later page that the stamp says The Library of Congress. A good portion of the pages are scratch work for his works. There is a drawing of an older man drawn in pencil. The drawing is simple, yet encompasses the man's figure well. The next drawing is of the same man with a disproportionate head to his body. The drawing seems to be almost in the style of a political carton. The man devolves as the pages go on. There is a mockup for a title for "The Bohemian". The rest of the journal contains a doodling of a skull on a heart with a dagger through it. I quite like it.

Step 2:

The first cover does show the addresses and names of people. The stamp was put there by The Library of Congress. The drawings are actually not done by Whitman himself, but they are rather of Whitman himself. The commentary suggests that the drawings were done by Pfaff, a friend of Whitman. One of the doodlings is of a harp and was possible drawn there because it is a symbol for poetry. The skull on a heart is suggested to be a metaphor. It is between day and night and life and death. Seeing the ravages of war makes a person question the true meaning of life when it goes away so easily and seemingly without meaning. The purpose of living must've weighed heavily on Whitman's mind and of the people during this time.

"Breathing dreams like air..."

1. How would you describe the “American Dream?”

The American Dream is an idealistic belief in a life which perfectly upholds the values the United States is believed to have. The common person defines the dream as having 2.5 kids and a house with a white, picket fence. This person would see kids who group up normally and fit in without problems, then going to college and doing well for themselves while the parents coast on a typical retirement kick.

2. What is your definition of wealth?

My definition of wealth is that wealth is an accumulation of ideas or items considered to be of value. 

3. What are Americans’ attitudes toward wealth and poverty?

In America, the citizens are more likely to reward the person who is wealthy for whatever he or she has done to obtain his or her status, while the same citizens want to punish people who must have done something wrong in order to be impoverished. It is hypocritical. In the same breath, these are the people who praise underdogs and love rags-to-riches stories. The common beliefs are that a person status and wealth are reflected by character rather than luck or even birth. Since everyone believes that even has an equal chance, it is not a long reach for the people to believe if someone is poor, then it is of his or her own doing rather than chance.

4. What is your attitude toward wealth and poverty?

I believe wealth is a corrupting factor, at least in America. The wealthy perpetuate a system of bigotry against those who do not mirror their own kind. The impoverished are then left in mass branded as invalids. The current system feeds into itself. The one we have only grows despite the common belief that even has an equal chance in America. If everyone is equal, then parents would not move to choose schools based upon location and demographics. The divide between the two in America is almost perfectly archetypal. Dangerously close to the Roman elite with "panem et circenses" and Bourgeoisie "let them eat cake". 

Nothing Really Mattress

#1:As Gregor Samsa awoke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself transformed in his bed into a gigantic insect.

-"uneasy" leads one to feel almost ill or sick
-"awoke" is more sophisticated than "woke"
-"transformed" sounds more scientific than, say, "change"

#2:Gregory Samsa woke from uneasy dreams one morning to find himself changed into a giant bug.

-"woke" and "changed" are both more plain and common 
-"to find" is used instead of "he found" which makes the discovery less personal

#3:When Gregor Samsa awoke from troubled dreams one morning he found he had been transformed in his bed into an enormous bug.

-"troubled" makes the dreams sound as if it's them who have the problem rather than Gregor

-"his bed" is mentioned making it more descriptive and personal

#4:One morning, upon awakening from agitated dreams, Gregor Samsa found himself, in his bed, transformed into a monstrous vermin.

-the prepositional phrase "in his bed" is separated by commas clouding the sentence and removing the flow the other sentences have

-"monstrous" makes the bug, or "vermin", seem much more horrid as in "bug" being replaced by "vermin"

How does the word choice, syntax, punctuation, and imagery shift in each affect meaning? 

Word choice change the meaning relating to the connotations. Connotation is what the reader brings into the picture. The implied meaning that isn't written. Syntax is what paints the word picture in your head. The order that the words are in places the emphasis in different parts and can even affect how the connotation is being read. Punctuation allows for the syntax to stay, but still change the emphasis. Punctuation can also affect the mood and the whole way the sentence is supposed to be interpreted. Imagery shift has a main effect on the setting and scene that's occurring. It ties in what isn't there and helps the reader to finish the scene in their head. 

Is one more effective than another?Why? 

The most effective one is word choice because connotations are everything. Connotations can even take over the denotation of the word.

What does this exercise bring up about the difficulty of reading translated texts? 

It illustrates how translating a text steals the soul out of the work. The translator must take great liberties and can never truly express the meaning because of the word choice. The author wrote it in that language for a reason.

How do different translations effect the tone of the sentence? 

The connotations of the different words in the different translations can completely change how the reader reads or interprets the narrator. A gigantic insect is gross in some people's minds and not in others, but if you want to cement the grossness of the insect, calling it a "monstrous vermin" seals the deal. It even conjures up images of dirty mice. 

FREEBIE SECOND SEMESTER

Double Indemnity

Heroes of Double Indemnity

Google defines hero as "a person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities" and/or "a submarine sandwich".

Since Double Indemnity has a serious lack of sandwiches, the first definition is the working definition for this post. 

No one is a hero forever. At different parts in life, people make mistakes and do great acts of kindness. The film is no anomaly to this. A hero, by definition, must be "admired" or "idealized". Whether the person is fit for admiration, lies in the eye of the beholder.

Walter Neff is a hero to his boss towards the beginning of the movie. The boss compliments and praises Walter when suggesting that he be promoted. The average person would not call a simple insurance salesman a hero, but by this definition and his boss' display, Walter is a hero. His "outstanding achievements" and "noble qualities'' to his specific job are why his boss offered him the promotion in the first place. During this scene, Walter is a hero to the boss no matter what the audience or other characters choose to believe.  

Walter is also a hero to his love interest, Phyllis Dietrichson. While plotting the murder and committing the murder, he represents a man "idealized for courage" to Phyllis. Even though she is the true mastermind using him, there is a place in her where she acknowledges his courage to go through with it. Walter does not resemble the popular idea of a hero by murdering Phyllis' husband, but he is still a hero in someone's eyes. 

A hero is not a person who is admired by most, nor is it some fantastical person who represents the absolute good of mankind. Nobleness, achievements, and courage live in a gray zone that each person must decide which is which for his or her own self.  When Double Indemnity is called a "movie without a hero", the person is taking great liberties in saying his or her way of thinking and defining a hero is the true, absolute way. Arguments could be furthered in saying that some people value the certain traits that Walter and Phyllis upheld, but for the sake of argument, the common definition most agreed on was used.